Code quality — 5-tool stack (Sonarcloud + CodeRabbit + Codecov + Code Climate + DeepSource)

Five code-quality tools per public repo \ tools. Sonarcloud (SAST + smells), CodeRabbit (LLM PR review), Codecov (coverage\ \ delta), Code Climate (A \u2014 F maintainability), DeepSource (autofix). All five\ \ free for the family's public / OSS repos. Builds on the earlier 4-tool stack \u2014\ \ adds Codecov + Code Climate + DeepSource alongside the existing Dependabot + biome\ \ + CodeRabbit + Sonarcloud."

Code quality — 5-tool stack

Decision

Every public repo in the chirag127/oriz* family runs five complementary code-quality tools. All five are free for OSS / public repos — the family’s repos-work-independently posture and the user’s “all of the repositories are public. Everything is public and open source” direction keep every repo eligible for free tiers across the board.

This builds on (does not supersede) the earlier 4-tool stack documented in decisions/process/code-quality-stack.md: Dependabot + biome + CodeRabbit + Sonarcloud stay; Codecov + Code Climate + DeepSource are added alongside.

Why all five

Each tool catches a different failure mode and renders the result on a different surface:

• Sonarcloud — SAST (data-flow-aware), the broadest rule library on TS, but its dashboard is the densest signal.
• CodeRabbit — LLM-grade review of intent and design. Catches things rules can’t encode (a refactor that breaks a contract, a function name that misleads).
• Codecov — coverage delta is the most-read PR signal during reviews; Sonarcloud also tracks coverage but its rendering is buried.
• Code Climate — A — F per-file grade is the cheapest “is this file getting worse?” glance; complements Sonarcloud’s full report.
• DeepSource — only tool that opens autofix PRs. Cheapest path from “issue reported” to “issue fixed in repo”.

The user’s direction was: “use everything … so that everything is done best.” For public-OSS repos, “everything” costs nothing. For private repos, the family would scale this back — but every family repo is public per the user’s stated posture, so no scale-back needed.

Implications

• templates/per-site-ci/.github/workflows/ci.yml gains three new steps:
  • codecov/codecov-action@v5 after the Vitest run (uploads LCOV).
  • paambaati/codeclimate-action@v9 (or the Code Climate GitHub App, whichever ships the cleaner status check).
  • DeepSource is GitHub-App-native; the .deepsource.toml config file lands at the repo root via the same template, no workflow step required.
• Repo root config files added by the template:
  • codecov.yml — coverage threshold + flag config
  • .codeclimate.yml — engines config (eslint / duplication / structure)
  • .deepsource.toml — analyser + transformer config
• Apply via runbooks/workflow/apply-per-site-ci.md to every site + package submodule (11 sites + 6 packages).
• GitHub App installs are one-time, account-wide:
  • Codecov GitHub App
  • Code Climate Quality GitHub App
  • DeepSource GitHub App Sonarcloud + CodeRabbit + Dependabot are already installed.
• Status-check matrix on every PR: PR fails if any of Sonarcloud quality gate / Codecov coverage threshold / Code Climate maintainability gate / DeepSource issue gate fails. CodeRabbit posts comments only — no failing check (LLM review is advisory).
• Quota safeguard (rules/interaction/never-hit-quotas.md): every tool runs on free OSS tier with no metering. If the family ever flips a repo private, that single repo drops the four paid-for-private tools (Codecov, Code Climate, DeepSource, Sonarcloud) and runs only Dependabot + biome + CodeRabbit on free private tier — documented but not currently in scope.

Cross-refs

• Code quality services index — per-tool detail
• Earlier 4-tool stack decision — supersedes-by-extension; that decision stays the source for biome + Dependabot rationale
• Per-site CI runbook
• Repos work independently rule
• No card-on-file rule
• Never hit quotas rule

Edit on GitHub · Back to index