type: rule
timestamp: 2026-06-20
tags: [meta, taste, preferences]

User prefers atomic split over consolidation

User prefers atomic split over consolidation

User prefers atomic split over consolidation

The rule

When a decision involves picking between “consolidate into N bigger units” vs “split into M smaller units” (with M > N), default to the more-smaller option unless there’s a specific reason not to.

The evidence

Three independent decisions on 2026-06-20 all picked the more-aggressive split over the recommendation:

  1. Tools shape (recommended: 1 tools-site monorepo with 15 subdomain builds; chosen: 15 separate repos). tools-site-15-repos.md.
  2. Package count (recommended: 5 packages; chosen: 14 atomic packages). .
  3. Day-1 tool scope (recommended: ship Tier 1 only as 8 repos, scaffold rest; chosen: all 15 repos + Pages projects on day 1). tool-categories-roadmap.md.

That’s not a one-off — it’s the third time in one session, on three independent decisions. It’s a taste.

How to apply

When designing the next AskUserQuestion:

When the rule does NOT apply

The taste isn’t unconditional. It’s about structural splits — repos, packages, subdomains, knowledge files. It’s NOT about:

The pattern: split the artifacts (code + repos + content), unify the runtime (auth + workers + accounts).


Edit on GitHub · Back to index